Justice Usha Mehra Commission on 22 February submitted its report to on the 16 December Delhi gang-rape incident to the Union. held on were noted and approved by the Commission. Agenda Item No Recommendations of Justice Usha Mehra. Committee Report regarding. headed by Justice Usha Mehra, a retired judge of the Delhi High reviewed various Supreme Court judgments on reservation, reports of the.
|Published (Last):||17 December 2009|
|PDF File Size:||9.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It also includes the mhra purpose and their representations in Local Bodies, Municipalities, State Legislature and the Parliament. Justice usha mehra Commission is not a Statutory Commission appointed under any Law. The menra of the Commission has been prepared with undue haste and with speed and submitted its report on The Constitutional prupose is not limited to Andhra Pradesh and not with reference to only reservations in respect of admission to educational institutions and public employment.
Further, in Andhra Pradesh, the State is divided into six zones. A demand from a community to categorise and rwport divide the SCs, is against the National Unity and Integrity and any attempt to divide or to classify, will have its ramifications in the entire country and in every State and Union Territories causing dissentions and disturbances and tension every where.
National Entrepreneurship Awards Muniswamy pillai is out of context and the Commission ignored the very fact that the test for inclusion in the list of SCs is extreme social, educational and economic backwardness arising out of traditional practice of untouchability. The Commission’s report to appoint another judicial commission to be headed by a sitting or a retired High Court Judge to collect data regarding representations of various castes of the SCs in the service of the State as well as in Educational Institutions is highly impracticable and is undersirable.
The Commission did not bother even to study the implications of the judgement nor discussed anywhere in the report about the findings of the Supreme Court and the remedies suggested by the Supreme Court. They are outside the chaturvarna system and all are untouchables. Further, the Commission conveniently not taken into account and failed to take note of the special schemes being implemented by the Government for Madigas, the facilities and services being extended by LIDCAP and establishment of Leather Parks in various districts investing several crores of rupees by alloting thousands of acres.
Chennaiah’s case and to examine the Constitutional, Statutory and Legal ramifications.
The Commission failed to take note of the definition of SCs as defined in Article 24 as such castes, races or tribes or parts of groups of such castes, races or tribes as are deemed under Article to be Scheduled Castes for the purpose of the Constitution.
Hence the justiice of the Commission is unilateral, irrational and unreasonable. But, as per decennial growth rate, it should be We, on behalf of the Association for Social Action, Andhra Pradesh an intellectual group of Scheduled Caste officers endeavoring for the promotion of Welfare, xommission and unity among the Scheduled castes, present the following objections on the report submitted by Justice Usha Mehra Commission on with an appeal to consider the issue in a fair, just, objective and dispassionate manner.
Law Commission recommended by a majority “swift” abolition of death penalty except in terror-related cases, noting it does not serve the penological goal of deterrence any commossion than life imprisonment. The schedule castes are not heterogeneous as commission is trying to portray.
మల్లెల మాల మహాసభ: THE REPORT OF JUSTICE USHA MEHRA COMMISSION
For instance, in A. It was only dealing with categorization of Backward Classes and the Court itself discussed at length about the class and caste and held categorically the judgement is not applicable to Scheduled Castes.
The observations of the Commission that Madiga is not numerically dominant caste is also fallacious for the reasons that the Commission showed their population as Thus, the observations particularly made with reference to Malas, that for Malas, Madigas are untouchables has no basis and irrelevant and biased and motivated. Justice Usha Mehra Commission observed that it was happy for getting a positive response for categorization. They suffer from illiteracy, poverty, squalor, hunger and decease.
But, the Commission in its over anxiety and over enthusiasm tried to project the figures furnished by the MRPS without proper verification and without application of mind. Or whether the reservations are to be appointed based on the region etc.
The Home Ministry is likely to reject Law Commission’s recommendation for abolition of death penalty, maintaining that time was not ripe yet to remove it.
While the panel will also give its full report in a few weeks from now, it wants to give an interim-report. While working out the proportionality on the basis of the population, the conclusions of the report are crucial. Home Ministry against abolition of death penalty 4 Oct, Home Ministry has finally made public the Justice Mehra Commission report that inquired into the lapses leading to the incident as well as ATR on its recommendations. Mehra Commission recommendations placed before Cabinet Sources said the Home Ministry has accepted several of the recommendations of the panel and these were placed before the Cabinet for final approval.
JUSTICE USHA MEHRA COMMISSION
It is also observed that Paky, Moti, Thoti, they accept food and water from all the communities and render their services to all except Mala and Re;ort. The report of the Commission is against the National Unity and Integrity. The Commission also failed to note that the judgement of the Indrashaney is not applicable in respect of Scheduled Castes. Madiga is one caste among the castes. Thus, the whole exercise of the Commission is futile. In respect of Relli, it is stated that they do not take food or water from Mala, Madiga and Paky.
Government Two government appointees in the law panel — then ex-offic Hence there is no commixsion or justification to divide the SCs which is not in the interests of the Country as a whole. Mallu Ravi, State representative at Delhi and Shri. Thus it is prejudicial, pre-determined, pre- judged and the recommendation for sub classification of Scheduled Castes is a foregone conclusion.
There will be uzha need for any complaint if these schemes are implemented for the individual benefit and for the area developement as contemplated. Government of India is concerned with the welfare of the SCs as a whole in the entire country.
It is admitted in the Commission report that Malas are also called as Adi-andhras. Chinnaiah’s case wherein it was categorically said and held that the Parliament is only having a limited power of making exclusion or inclusion in the list and there is no power either to sub-divide or sub-classify or sub-group these castes and that the castes mentioned in the list to be members of one group for the purpose of the constitution and this group could not be sub-divided for any purpose.
TomorrowMakers Let’s get smarter about money. Honestely Speaking, Justice Usha Mehra commission report is fallacious, beyond the scope of the reference,irrelevant, misleading and defective ysha on insufficient data and usna samples and erroneous conclusions drawn based on the selective representations presented by the MRPS deliberately to prove the Commission’s predetermined intention to sub-classify the Scheduled castes, which cannot be mehar upon and deserves to be ignored, and rejected in the larger interests of the scheduled castes and in the national intrests as a whole.
While dealing with Malas, they were also referred to Adi-andhras.